maryam adelnia
Abstract
One of the topics that has been examined in different interpretations is the discussion of the embodiment of deeds. Two contemporary commentators, Allameh Tabatabai and Dr. Zaheili, have also addressed this issue in their commentary and have explained whether the punishment of deeds is evolutionary or ...
Read More
One of the topics that has been examined in different interpretations is the discussion of the embodiment of deeds. Two contemporary commentators, Allameh Tabatabai and Dr. Zaheili, have also addressed this issue in their commentary and have explained whether the punishment of deeds is evolutionary or conventional, based on their own perspectives. In his works, Dr. Zaheili has not raised the issue of the embodiment of deeds as an independent title, but among the Tafsir Al-Munir's commentary, he has presented two views about the embodiment of deeds, which are: the presence of deeds in the Day of Judgment as punishment and reward, which is the embodiment of deeds, and conventional reward and punishment of deeds. Allameh Tabataba'i also in Tafsir al-Mizan, by criticizing and examining different points of view, has proved the issue of the embodiment of deeds and the evolutionary relationship between worldly deeds and the appearance and presence of the deed in the hereafter as a reward or punishment for deeds. Finally, he interpreted the verses that refer to conventional reward and punishment and considered them suitable for the understanding of the people of the time of revelation. The method of this research is descriptive-analytical, and based on the interpretation provided by Allameh, it can be understood that the embodiment of deeds has no rational meaning
